Reporting Diversity
Television News 2005 Study

Gail Phillips, Murdoch University;
Suellen Tapsall, Murdoch University


Conclusion

Societies appear to be subject, every now and then, to periods of moral panic. A condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests; its nature is presented in a stylized and stereotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral barricades are manned by editors, bishops, politicians and other right-thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or...resorted to; the condition then disappears, submerges or deteriorates and becomes more visible. ...Sometimes the panic passes over and is forgotten, except in folklore and collective memory; at other times it has more serious and long-lasting repercussions and might produce such changes as those in legal and social policy or even in the way the society conceives itself. (Cohen 1987: 9)

Australia is not alone in the demonstrating an increased focus on terrorism in its television news. The impact of the war on terror has skewed news agendas around the globe (as an example the Centre for Media and Public Affairs’ Media Monitor shows how the trend has been manifested in the US). However the way the stories are told means we are seeing multicultural communities through a particular lens – a textbook example of what van Dijk calls the ‘new racism’ (2000:39) communicated through the subtle use of language and signs. As Iyengar et al note, ‘Television news may be objective, but it is far from neutral. The production of news takes place within boundaries established by official sources and dominant values’ (1987:133) and as this survey demonstrates the dominant values are resulting in an increased alienation of those perceived to be either un-Australian or less Australian than the rest of us.

While this survey has shown that non-Anglo Australians are almost inevitably represented as ‘bad’, ‘sad’, or ‘other’, in the current political climate the focus of the fear has overwhelmingly been Muslim terrorism which has in turn led to a suspicion of all things Muslim. The very nature of television news has helped to entrench the idea of alienation from the purported ‘mainstream’ with its cameras continually juxtaposing images of authority and rectitude against images representing ‘otherness’ in terms of dress, environment and behaviour. As Akbarzadeh & Smith note in their analysis of Melbourne’s print media, journalists cannot be blamed for negative news (2005:14), and much of the negative taint is caused by the nature of the stories themselves in this particularly violent age. However the framing of television news stories in ways that foreground anger and conflict, drama and threat (what Green has termed the ‘emotion bite’ rather than the ‘sound bite’ 2002:8) has served to heighten the negative associations and increase the fearfulness of the viewing public. This domestic climate of fear and distrust is further reinforced by the international acts of violence and terror that appear on our screens each night (Akbarzadeh & Smith:12). While for the Christian-Anglo communities in Australia the fear is directed at the ‘enemy within’, for the non-Anglo communities in general and the Muslim communities in particular the fear is focused on the broader community itself with the ever-present threat of a backlash that will make them targets in their turn.

It is fair to argue that Stanley Cohen’s description of a ‘moral panic’ quoted above exactly fits the state of the world and the nation in the post 9/11 years (see also Killingbeck 2001 on how the television news media can contribute to the creation of a moral panic). The spectre of terrorism looms over our lives and Australia’s active participation in the War on Terror has made us particularly fearful of the prospect of a terror attack on our soil. But it is fair to ask as Suzanne Davies does

When political leaders of Western nations call upon “us” to join in the “war against terrorism”, whom do they speak for and to? When they implore us to not merely consent to but embrace ever more intrusive and aggressive policies and tactics within their own constituencies and beyond, do they reflect a common will or their own selective imaginings of who “we” are?’ p. 44

The fight against an unseen and unpredictable enemy has brought to the surface the innate distrust that has characterized Australian’s view of foreigners since the days of the White Australia policy (see Smith and Phillips 2001) and this distrust permeates our television news.

The data shows some variation in the way different services treat their news. Channel Seven tends towards the most dramatic representation in presentation, tone and language. The public broadcasters SBS and ABC are the most restrained, tending to play down the drama and adopting a more emotionally neutral style. However it is the Shepparton regional news service via WIN News which most focuses on the human interest personalised stories that allow us to see the Muslim community as normal participants in the community’s daily life. Given Galtung and Ruge’s dictum that ‘the less personal the news, the more negative it will be’(1965:83) perhaps the Shepparton example shows us the way ahead. If the television news services can use their storytelling powers to tell more of the whole story they will be doing their bit to ensure the portrait of the nation that we see on our screens each night is a more accurate representation of the real Australia. As Cottle (2000:2) notes, the media’s ‘crucial role in the public representation of unequal social relations’ has a positive as well as a negative side. While the media can on the one hand divide us into ‘"us" and "them", "insider" and "outsider", "colonizer" and "colonized", "citizen" and "foreigner", "normal" and "deviant", "friend" and "foe", "the west" and "the rest"’ they can, on the other, ‘serve to affirm social and cultural diversity and, moreover, provide crucial spaces in and through which imposed identities or the interests of others can be resisted, challenged and changed.'

Top

Member : Murdoch UniversityMember: Griffith UniversityMember: University of South AustraliaMember: Media MonitorsMember: SBSMember: University of CanberraMember: Journalism Education AssociationMember: University of Western Sydney
Department of Immigration and Citizenship